Why Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Is a Waste of Taxpayer Money
"In Florida, during the four months the state tested for drug use, only 2.6% of applicants tested positive. Meanwhile, Florida has an illegal drug use rate of 8%, meaning far fewer people on services are using drugs than their better-off counterparts. The drug testing cost taxpayers more money than it saved, and was ruled unconstitutional last year."
The tired image of the welfare queen with six kids, driving around in a
Cadillac, watching soap operas on an expensive television and eating junk food
on the couch has had its day.
It is 2014, years into the Great
Recession, and millions have been helped by hundreds of social services put in place by the government to
stabilize families in this time of need. Yet the states insist upon making the
lines between the rich and poor ever darker, ever harder to cross. Maine lines up as the latest in a host of states
beginning to enforce drug-testing legislation for welfare recipients.
People tend to forget that those
using the programs are most likely also taxpayers, or were at some point. In 2010, nearly half of poor or near poor mothers on welfare were working
at least part time. My husband and I, for instance, worked a
combined 45 years, paying taxes, before he lost his job two weeks before I had premature twins, and
had to apply for the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program. During the time
we were on aid, I held a fulltime job, meaning I was paying in to the system
from which I was simultaneously benefiting.The testing is meant to assure
taxpayers their money isn’t being “wasted” on the less desirable, those who
would somehow manage to buy drugs with the assistance. But in Tennessee, where
drug testing was enacted for welfare recipients last month, only one person in the 800 who applied for help tested positive.
In Florida, during the four months the state tested for drug use, only 2.6% of applicants tested positive. Meanwhile, Florida
has an illegal drug use rate of 8%, meaning far fewer people on services are using drugs
than their better-off counterparts. The drug testing cost taxpayers more money
than it saved, and was ruled unconstitutional last year.
Our family is not alone. Denise
Calder, a middle school teacher in Broward County, Florida, has a Bachelors of
Science from Tufts University and has worked steadily since 1994. “Now I’m 42
years old, divorced, a single mother of four,” she told me. She makes $41,300
year. “Every penny goes to food, rent, gas, medical bills,” she says. “Since
2009, I have had to apply for and accept Medicaid & SNAP [Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program] twice to provide for my children when I took
maternity leave in 2009 and 2013.”
When I signed up for WIC services in
2008, I was a television producer in Boston, creating a news show seen by
millions of people a night. I was making $40,000 a year and my husband had just
been laid off. During my three months of maternity leave, my salary was
$25,000, but our family qualified for the WIC program on my full income. We
used it for 18 months. And we needed it.
WIC is an income-based program.
Women must make no more than185% of the
Federal poverty line guidelines, and in some states, they must
actually be living at or below the poverty line. Statistics from the Food and Nutrition Service department show
that 73% of people on WIC are making less than the federal poverty line.
The income cut-off for a family of four is $44,123 a year.
It’s also not just a phone call and
done. Women applying must be pregnant or up to six months post-partum. Children
can receive services up to their fifth birthday,
according to the United States Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition
Services. Once you’ve called, you have to provide proof of income for everyone
in the household, proof of identity, proof of residence, proof of participation
in any other program—including Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or General
Assistance—immunization records for your children, pregnancy confirmation
(official note from your doctor), recent height and weight measurements and a
blood test for hemoglobin levels, and a WIC Referral Form from your doctor. You
also have to provide documentation of any child support payments, unemployment
benefits, or short-term disability money received. These requirements vary
slightly from state to state, but for the most part they are consistent.
Once you’ve gone through all that,
you have to wait to be processed and either accepted or rejected. After the
whole process, you may still hear that you aren’t poor enough (for instance, if
you are receiving child support or if you can’t provide certain paperwork).
Bree Casson, a divorced former army wife who works part-time at McDonald’s, was
turned away from the WIC office last week because she didn’t have her family’s
Medicaid cards, despite multiple phone and mail requests to the Department of
Health and Human Services.
“I dragged my three kids out, with
all our paperwork, including our Medicaid numbers,” she said, “and they
insisted they needed the physical cards to prove our income eligibility. I’ve
been trying to get those cards for two years with no luck. All this for some milk
and cheese and vegetables.”
Applying and being accepted for aid
is a mentally grueling process that can stretch on for months. Add to that the
humiliation of having to pee in a cup just because you can’t afford to eat.
There’s already a huge stigma about having to receive services, a spiral of
shame and embarrassment that permeates the use of the system. Instead of
wasting taxpayer money to weed out a small percent of those in need, demonizing
an entire sect of people in favor of misleading stereotypes, maybe it’s time we
put our funds into helping them find their way out of the system and onto their
own two feet.
Darlena Cunha is a mother of twins
and a freelance writer for The Washington Post, Gainesville Sun and Gainesville and Ocalamagazines.
You can reach her @parentwin on Twitter.